Claude 4.5 Opus

The thinking "Giant of Knowledge." The pinnacle of overwhelming reasoning capability and agent functions that complete tasks autonomously - Detailed Analysis Report

Last Surveyed: January 31, 2026

Claude 4.5 Opus

Anthropic | Released: November 2025

💰 Usage Fee (Pro) $20 / month
🔗 API (Input/Output) $5.00 / $25.00 (1M tokens)
🆓 Free Tier None (Sonnet only)
⚡ Reasoning Precision SOTA (Post-GPT-5 level)
💻 Specialization Engineering / Serious Writing
👁️ Unique Features Computer Use / Thinking Blocks
🤝 Consistency High (Some reports of performance dips)

👤 AI Persona

Claude Opus Persona

"The solitary artisan engineer"

⭐ Overall Rating

✨ Unique Features

  • Computer Use: An AI agent feature that "sees" the screen, operates the cursor, and controls apps at will.
  • Infinite Chats: Seamless integration of long-term memory and context retention, removing the feeling of context limits.
  • Effort Parameter: Allows control over directions like "think more deeply" through numerical parameters.
  • Thinking Blocks: Visualizes and retains the thought process, avoiding the black boxing of complex reasoning.

📈 Benchmark Comparison

🆚 vs GPT 5 (GPT-5.2)

Inference SpeedChatGPT is Faster
CostClaude is Higher
CodingClaude Leads (+0.9%)

🆚 vs Gemini 3 Pro

Context RetentionGemini is Vast
CostGemini is Budget
ProgrammingOpus Dominates (+4.7%)

📝 Executive Summary

Claude Opus 4.5 is the high-end AI model released by Anthropic in November 2025.

As the "Coding Champion," it boasts performance that overwhelms competitors in complex engineering tasks and autonomous agent operations (Computer Use).

However, entering January 2026, there have been successive reports of performance degradation (the "Lobotomized" theory) in some areas, and users are in a phase of carefully judging whether it is worth the high cost.

💰 Pricing Details

  • Claude Pro: $20/month (Individuals, with usage limits)
  • Claude Team: $25/user/month (5+ users, with team management features)
  • API Pricing: Input $5.00 / Output $25.00 (per 1M tokens)

🎯 Key Benchmark Results

Benchmark Score Evaluation
SWE-bench Verified 80.9% No. 1 in the World
Terminal-Bench 59.3% Strongest in Operation Automation
ARC-AGI-2 37.6% Slightly behind GPT-5.2

✅ Pros and Cons

👍 Pros

  • World's best coding capability (SWE-bench 80.9%).
  • Automation of GUI operations via Computer Use.
  • Natural and sophisticated writing style for long-form content.

👎 Cons

  • Reports of performance dips in early 2026 (the "Lobotomized" theory).
  • Extremely high API costs compared to competitors.
  • Slower inference response than other SOTA models.

💭 Reddit User Sentiment

Negative (Frustration Boils Over) 2.8 / 5.0
Source: Analysis of 180 posts from r/ClaudeAI and r/LocalLLaMA

Positive Comments

"Opus is the only one I can trust with complex refactoring. I'm afraid to use other models."
"I had it deploy an app made with Artifacts on the spot. This is the future."

Negative Comments

"It's clearly become dumber since January. It forgets simple instructions; where did its previous brilliance go?"
"It's too 'lazy.' Even when asked to write the whole code, it brushes me off with omitted comments."

🎯 Recommended Use Cases

  1. Production-level Complex Coding - Consistent development from design to implementation.
  2. Autonomous Agent Tasks - Automation of PC operations across multiple apps.
  3. Writing Papers Requiring Deep Thought - Organizing logical structures and refining writing styles to the limit.

📊 Conclusion & Overall Rating

Overall Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (3.8/5.0)

Claude Opus 4.5 is undoubtedly a "tool for artisans." Its "depth" in coding and complex reasoning sits in a realm untouched by others.

However, its unstable behavior and high cost in early 2026 are non-negligible drawbacks. For professionals pursuing "quality over quantity," it is a unique but perhaps temperamental genius.